Following a random night out at the Scala to attend White Mischief, a group of us went to an unusual variety show hosted by Miss Behave last Friday. The Camden roundhouse theatre was a great venue (though the service at the bar and elsewhere was typically awful - I’ll complain at some other point at length about how these partly charity based venues always seem to miss the point on service). The acts were varied and I had a great time.
The highlight was a pair of songs and some amusing commentary by Frank Sanazi - Frank Sanatra songs covered by Adolf Hitler. Hilarious as long as you were prepared to leave your politically correct radar tuned down. If you get a chance to see him, make sure you do.
|
August 17th, 2008
7287pwkr
Yet another twist in th unreality that it quantum physics, in this article we get the first hint that the collapse of the quantum state - is not absolute. Researchers confirmed a hypothesis that you could sort of measure the state of a particle and then stuff it back into the quantum state.
I wonder what this would imply for quantum cryptography. The theory relies upon the fact that you can’t measure the state of a particle without signaling that fact - you can tap the line but people are guaranteed to know. If the measurement distinction is not so black and white, does this theory still hold?
|
August 10th, 2008
7287pwkr
BT is building a rather well known network to replace it’s existing one - it’s all bundled under the name 21CN (for 21st Century Network).
One of the lesser known aspects of this is the API into the network functions. I started playing with this on Saturday and was surprised by a number of things:
1) It’s really easy to get started and use
2) It seems to do a lot less than I might have expected
3) What it does do is really quite useful
It took about 2 hours from first registering to getting my first little mini application interfacing with the system - pretty neat and you can test some sensible stuff for free - sending SMSs and making calls though there are some pretty obvious restrictions (you can’t call premium rate numbers for example).
That said, there’s only about 6 things you can do with the much vaunted plaform:
- Send SMS messages
- Receive SMS messages and react in some way
- Set up a call between 2 3rd parties
- Set up an manage a conference call
- Set up a IVR call flow application
- Set up a database of users with attributes
That’s it - however in all that there’s enough to do all the basics of a adding telephony integration to your business. I’m sure there are cheaper ways to do any one of these, but it’s certainly a nice integrated service.
|
August 3rd, 2008
7287pwkr
This is great news for me at least. I’ve really only ever bought books from 2 places on-line. Now those places are one. If this integrates with Amazon Prime I’m officially never leaving the house again!
|
August 3rd, 2008
7287pwkr
Seth Godin always finds a way to challenge me. Every post is annoying because he asks why you’re not doing something obvious you never thought of.
The latest wheeze is TriIibes - a sort of melting pot of his readers but by invitation only. It’s easy to get one, just pre-order his new book and it would be simple to dismiss as a stunt but it’s first week Seth is obviously watching. If it’s a stunt it’s a lot of work to sell maybe an extra two thousand books.
|
August 2nd, 2008
7287pwkr
For some years now the US Internet providers have been compelled to comply with the conditions of the DCMA in which their customers can be prosecuted for criminal copyright infringement based on very fragile evidence. The ISPs seem, to my mind, to have been very helpful to the music industry and focussed few resources on helping their customers.
Now in the UK we have the announcement in the FT that we’re getting a similar voluntary regime here. The BPI (the local equivalent of the music industry body) will monitor the file sharing networks and pass the IP addresses of ‘offenders’ on to the ISPs. The ISPs will, at first, send warning letters but clearly this will escalate to ‘repeat offenders’ being booted from the Internet and possibly have criminal charges brought against them.
Why are the ISPs so compliant here? It’s simple economics.
There are 2 ways in the UK an ISP carries traffic between the Internet and their customers. Smaller ISPs buy wholesale access to the end users from BT Wholesale. They pay a per user fee and also a per megabyte charge based on the overall volume of traffic between themselves and the user. It doesn’t matter if that’s Internet traffic or simply email delivered from the ISPs local mail server.
Larger ISPs place DSLAMs (big boxes that terminate DSL lines) into exchanges about the country and then buy backhaul links from those exchanges to their data centres (this is the process of unbundling). They pay Openreach a fixed fee per user and for the backhaul links based on link capacity. Most large ISPs also infill the places in the country where they have not unbundled by reselling the same BT Wholesale services as the smaller ISPs.
The vast majority of ISP end user contracts are fixed price. There has been some attempt to segregate users by selling cheaper packages with usage caps, but no sensible heavy users are on these packages.
While the ISPs must also buy Internet access, this is quite cheap compared to the backhaul costs. In fact the backhaul costs represent the largest portion of their operational costs.
Essentially the ISPs make money by overselling their backhaul and Internet access capacity. They get a fixed income from the user, and they pay part of this for access to the user and some overhead. The rest is used to pay for backhaul. What’s left is profit.
This is a great model when user’s don’t use the network for much. Backhaul is cheap and the ISPs reap in the money. It’s a terrible model when a significant number of your users use large volumes of bandwidth. The ISPs have a number of options to address this though:
- Charge the users more or move to variable pricing: They’ve ben reluctant to do this because end users migrate to the fixed price offerings. While the ISP may be succesful in charging more to high volume users, they simultaneously loose all the high margin low volume users. Building packages for low volumes users at a discount moves these guys from high margin to medium margin and the end users don’t move - they think they use quite a bit of bandwidth even though they don’t.
- Get the high volume users off the network: Also tough to do mostly because there are so many of them. The constant refrain has been “5% of the users use 80% of the bandwidth”. This is true but it’s never the same 5% - they cover 50% or more of their customer base here.
- Get the users to stop using so much bandwidth: They’ve been doing this. Traffic shaping has imposed effective bandwidth caps on certain applications, but there are technical way around this which are easy even for non-technical users. It’s a race and the ISPs are losing.
- Scare the users into stopping sharing big video files - hmm - sounds a lot like the recent announcement don’t you think?
I contend that the reason the ISPs are “working with the BPI to protect artists” is so that they have a weapon to remove heavy users from their networks. More importantly, this allows they to act in concert, against anti-competition law, to fix commercial policy. They can get rid of the heavy users if they all act together - that’s been illegal up to now but in guise of copyright protection they can do this and even act as if they’re sorry about it.
Too heavy handed? Let’s look at how they’ve reacted to a video download service which is legal - the BBC iPlayer. This allows people in the UK to download or stream, for free, BBC video content. It will not be covered by the new agreement since it’s perfectly legal. The ISPs have been going crazy over this ever since it was launched. The same arguments - it kills the service for other users, it’s consuming all our bandwidth, we get nothing for supporting the BBC - have been deployed.
The Alternatives prove my point
Now let’s look at the alternative proposal - that a surcharge is placed on Internet access to compensate artists for their losses. The BPI would love this - free money for something they can’t stop anyway. It’s the model that would have been imposed under government intervention. The ISPs would hate this.
In this instance the ISPs become responsible for collecting a fee and distributing it to the BPI. Their end users would call in droves, prices would appear to go up, and the IPS get nothing for this.
In return, end users would have free reign to download without fear. Backhaul prices would go through the roof and the ISPs would have no way to counter this.
Does it become obvious why they adopted the voluntary regime now?
Footnotes:
- Much of this is from a UK point of view - I imagine by adjusting for local network conditions it could easily apply to other markets.
- ISPs also make money selling services such as email or video - while these use backhaul bandwidth, there is enough predictability built in to allow them to price in this cost.
Disclaimer: I work for a business that sells backhaul in the UK. Clearly none of this is their opinion nor relates to their business in any way.
|
July 27th, 2008
7287pwkr
We’ve always known that people on the other end of an email address are not like people on the other end of the phone. Not from their point of view but from ours. Perfectly nice people will turn into crazy abusive monsters while emailing and say things they’d never dream of face to face.
So it is with the structure of relationships as well when mediated by electrons ( or indeed increasingly by photons ). We structure them differently and everything seems to me done at a speed you’d never consider with a real person.
I don’t know if it’s the response time - you’d never see a new friend 40 times a week or have that many phone calls but it’s pretty trivial to do that by mail and not notice. How can we help nut get entangled faster than before.
I’d never subscribe to the theis that they’re not more real then the relationships we build in real life. I’m sure people said that of talking on the phone, then of the mobile. Forget that -those friends exist in every sense that’s real. But the tools and structures we built to mediate the friction between people are creaking and in danger of being lost. They got in the way but they gave us something as well. Be nice if we could capture that value.
|
July 24th, 2008
7287pwkr
Have been messing about with the new software for my iPhone and one of the things you get is a wordpress application. So now I can compose rubbish to say while on the train instead of having to wait until I get home. Isn’t progress wonderful ?
On the iPhone software update. It’s not great. From a nice stable version four minor release the dot zero release is buggy and has numerous stalls. The app store is cute but I should have waited for the next version.
|
July 23rd, 2008
7287pwkr
There’s a somewhat provocative article in a Boston paper. It’s focus is that though SSRI drugs like Prozac have very successfully treated depression, the way we thought they worked is completely wrong and is hiding a more fundamental understanding of the deep problem - depression, they claim, is a result of your brain cells shrinking and dying. Prozac and the other SSRIs don’t correct an imbalance - under this scenario they help heal physical problems with the brain.
It’s a somewhat scary prospect. It would mean millions of people have brains that are seriously damaged. On the face of it I can’t dismiss this kind of finding out of hand. It could all be completely wrong, but I can’t say that just yet.
I do have some questions though - manic depression seems to push against this theory - people here swing from depressed to high functioning - is this yet another symptom of brain damage or does it suggest that this is a different disease from classic depression?
|
July 9th, 2008
7287pwkr
Just a short observation - Amazon prime is the best investment I’ve made this year. I no longer think about ordering minor items from Amazon and they turn up quickly. I used to group all my deliveries into one big box every few months and then Amazon would take a month to collate all the orders and the package would never fit into my post box and I’d end up collecting it from the post office 2 days later. Now I get lovely little one book parcels. I pre-order books I want to read that are not yet published and by magic they appear on my doorstep months later!
|
July 2nd, 2008
7287pwkr
Previous Posts
